Something hit me this week while the students were reading and attempting to analyze Julius Caesar. As a class, students have been chugging through this classic piece of drama, and completing various typical tasks along the way: vocabulary, graphic organizers, quizzes. My co-op taught a myriad of short lessons about literary devices and skills that are familiar to the average English classroom, like rising and falling action, cause and effect, figurative language, and characterization. Sounds pretty solid, right? Sounds like the English classes we grew up in, where every piece of literature served to place check marks next to state standards and cover specific aspects of curriculum. The kids should, then, be learning a lot and taking much away from this play. But they're not. Most of them couldn't remember from class to class what we had read and in terms of doing any deep, analytic thought about the thematic nuances or the deeper meanings of the play, most were both disinterested and not fluent. What's more, these things didn't matter to them and, even worse, didn't have much bearing at all on the corresponding work they were completing.
I was trying to figure out why these students were not getting it, why this unit was falling flat for them. After about a week, it became apparent: it was boring, painful even. The entire unit was lifeless, focused strictly on coverage, and did not possess even one creative aspect to engage students. Students walked in each day, sat down, trudged through as much reading as possible, filled out charts, answered objective questions, passively took notes, and worked on a long list of vocabulary. This was the scene for four weeks (they started a week before I got there) and would probably be the scene for at least one more week. To be honest, even I was bored, and I certainly wouldn't have wanted to be in their shoes. I was desperate to add some kind of creative aspect to the class, but was reluctant to give them even more work. So, for the non-hybrid English class, I asked them to create an epitaph for Caesar after he had been stabbed and the funeral speeches had been given. I wasn't expecting magic or anything overtly clever, but I was hopeful to at least provide a small break in the rigid routine and create some engagement. But they were completely stumped; it was as if I had turned their world upside down. They didn't know what to do and, even more telling, didn't know what I expected them to say. These students have been subjected to the same objective, multiple-choice, fill-in-the-blank, charts-and-tables, worksheet routine (in all of their classes, not just English) that they have a hard time being creative or thinking deeply about transferable concepts and meaning. This realization made me angry and frustrated, and made me feel sorry for these kids who are missing so much from their education.
This has proven to me how important having an engaged and creative classroom is. It creates relevance and gives the material life and purpose. Creativity gets students' juices flowing, facilitating deep thought and more memorable learning. (Ironically, I think students remember more from the creative, concept-centered classroom versus the objective, memorization-driven class.) I hope to never create a classroom that threatens to put both the teacher and the students into a boredom coma.